Two new books published for teachers!

(cross posting my 3-mths old post in The ICT Connection Happenings blog, which is opened to ‘members’ only)

—- <begin cross posting> —-

It’s been 1 year since the launch of The ICT Connection portal. Part of our objectives is to deepen the common understanding of the multifaceted concepts of mp3. In-line with this objective, we have worked over the past many months with the NIE professors. And today, we are pleased to share with you that two new books are now available for download through this portal.

 

The first book is titled “Self-Directed Learning with ICT: Theory, Practice and Assessment (By Tan Seng Chee et al.)

 

And the second book is “Advancing Collaborative Learning with ICT: Conception, Cases and Design (By Chai Ching Sing et al.)


With these two newly written books, one touching on SDL, and the other on CoL, we hope educators in schools will benefit from reading them as much as we do. Enjoy! (:

—- <end cross posting> —-

LK has also a post on the two books here (:

content analysis is … a revision

Content analysis has been described as a “research technique for the objective, systematic, quantitative description of the manifest content of communication” (Berelson, 1952, p. 519). This definition allows for a variety of textual analyses that typically involves comparing, contrasting, and categorizing a set of data (Schwandt, 1997). Content analysis has been used for the analysis of a variety of data types such as audio, video recordings or transcripts of classroom discussions, interviews, observations, field notes and, more recently, computer mediated communications (Harasim, 1987; Iseke-Barnes, 1996; Levin, Kim, & Riel, 1990; Mason & Romiskowski, 1996; Mowrer, 1996). Content analysis can involve both numeric (quantitative) and interpretive data analyses (qualitative), or combinations of both. Content analysis has been most fruitfully used in going beyond the surface content of the transcripts towards the identification and analysis of latent variables (such as student understanding, higher order learning outcomes etc.). Though this does bring another layer of subjectivity to the process, this is outweighed by the ability of this methodology to make grounded inferences about more fundamental issues that are of greater research interest.

— (very well) written by Koehler, Mishra and Yahya (2007, p.747-748) “THANK YOU!”

notes – content analysis and grounded theory seminar

this morning a couple of us went for a Content Analysis and Grounded Theory in Qualitative Research seminar conducted by Prof Peter Taylor (CRPP), 0930-1130hr, NIE5-01-LT11. here’s my personal set of notes. some symbols to take note: (1) words in quotes are the words i think i hear during the seminar; words in [square brackets] are personal thoughts; (2) words with a question mark attached? are words that i’m not sure if i see/hear correctly 😛

p@ssword to open: password2010 the set of notes (: