the long tail of education has hit back

1.5 yrs ago i blogged abt education having a long tail, and apparently, the long tail has hit back yesterday. coincidence with the arrival of the (water) snake perhaps? :O

yesterday, an estimated 3000-5000 pple gathered at the hong lim park to stage a protest of the recent white paper on population 2030. so how is this the long tail hitting back? before that, our teachers deserve a pat on their backs cos this is an excellent example of how our education has succeeded (:

one main argument seems to be focused on the figure “6.9”. since young, we were taught by our teachers that singapore is a very small island, with no natural resources. we acknowledged that we are but only one dot on the map, and some teachers may argue that a dot can be too big to represent singapore. we are so very small, we are so limited in land, resources. this idea has long been drilled and wired into many of our belief system. and this is the result of the explicit curriculum.

our learning from the implicit curriculum came from our day-to-day living experiences. those of us who grew up in relatively newer neighbourhoods such as Bishan, Yishun, Tampines, etc will have the smallness of singapore reinforced in us everyday. cos our blocks of flats are built in such close proximity that we can almost look across and see/smell what our neighbours’ cooking, and if they need us to pass them any ingredients via the windows. for those of us who drive, the carparks are again another channel of daily reinforcement of the smallness idea. every turn of the multi-storey carpark is like taking the Z-course in practical driving test. it feels good that we pass driving tests everyday, without scratching our cars against the wall or others’ bumpers when negotiating those sharp turns that is (:

when we are hit with the (big) number 6.9, the teaching in us immediately reacts to the stimulus. how can our such a small place contain much much more pple? 6.9 and the smallness & limitedness teachings react to each other like the like poles of magnet.

the success of our teaching has caused many of us to lose the deep blue sea thinking, or what benjamin zander termed as “the universe of possibility”. we could have totally lost it due to the explicit and implicit curriculum.

the long tail of education has hit back and to me, it doesnt appears to be a good stroke in this instance. #iwonder what other hits are waiting in line.

an insightful sharing of personal experience of the flipped classroom

the idea of flipped classroom(s) has gained attention in the recent 1-2 year or so. in her blog post “The Flip: End of a Love Affair“, Shelly Wright shared her flipping experiment and why she gave up flipped instruction. at one glance, it appears that the idea of flipped classroom doesnt work, but in fact as Shelly shared in her experience, the experiment worked out so well that her class has moved beyond the usual conception of a flipped classroom. not sure how many teachers would be as excited as me in learning how things had worked out and evolved. one thing i’m quite sure is Shelly plays a key role in this evolvement. imagine, a teacher who only asks students to watch videos at home, and babysit students in class to do their homework and act as a tutor if help is needed doesnt appear to be the way a flipped classroom will work out imho.

one of her ending statements serves as food for thought too:

“I’ve learned that inquiry & PBL learning can be incredibly powerful in the hands of students. I would never teach any other way again.”

 

learning analytics

saw this post by dr ashley tan on learning analytics. while looking at the infographic, i’m just thinking perhaps the day when learning analytics can be realised could be the day that learning for the sake of exams can (finally) be replaced with learning for the love of learning. and when that day comes, some teachers may sweat and feel helpless, cos one may not know how to teach not for the sake of exams while at the same time, teach with the support of machines (generalised to include both hardware n software)  :O

source acknowledgement: OpenColleges, via another dot in the blogosphere

above-level testing

in the oct 11 issue of ideas published by AST, dr. soh kc 苏启祯博士 wrote on a phenomena commonly described by students by word-of-mouth. the following quotes from pg 4 would give you an idea what above-level testing is:

“Our teachers said they marked our Sec Three papers using Sec Four standards.”
“Our Sec Four friends told us that they had the same tests.”
“Our teachers want us to know what Sec Four standards are.”
“Our teachers want our parents to motivate us because we must get ready for Sec Four.

i particularly like the Chinese proverb found in the ending para on pg 7:

“We learn that those who are too eager to get something done only make it worse and fail to achieve the expected results.”

正是“欲速则不达”。成语有的就是正常的 (:
(image acknowledgement: ast)

born to learn, we all are

saw this animation via tucksoon’s fb post. good reminders on how we should shape our classrooms, especially secondary ones, or should i say, primary 3 and above? PLAY is the key.

“it is almost a miracle that modern teaching methods have not yet entirely strangled the holy curiosity of inquiry” — albert einstein